有网友说，字节跳动和阿里巴巴的员工在一起开会，由于双方的电脑都无法安装对方的会议软件，所以最后不得不下载了腾讯会议来开会。
要说互联网什么事情离谱，这个事情，真的就是离谱。
我亲自去确认了一下，阿里巴巴的某员工告诉我，公司电脑禁止装字节跳动的飞书。而字节跳动的员工告诉我，公司电脑也禁止装阿里巴巴的钉钉。
所以这个事情大概率是真的，一旦阿里巴巴员工和字节跳动员工要一起开会的话，就不知道应该用什么会议软件了。反正互相不能在自己电脑上安装对方的软件。
我想中国互联网领域各个巨头分别占据自己的生态圈，自己的生态圈无法和对方生态圈兼容的事情，已经不是很稀奇了。毕竟抖音上要是发微信链接，微信上要是发支付宝链接，都不是一件很容易的事情。
但是竞争这么激烈，激烈到几家公司员工之间如果不得不有事情要互相开会，居然没办法用一个合适的会议软件。因为自己家办公的电脑，只能装自己家的软件。
那这个事情，你说合理吧，也合理。毕竟你们每家的软件都已经拒绝别家的链接传播了，为什么你们的员工就不应该禁止装别家的软件呢？
但是你要说离谱吧，那也真的很离谱。阿里巴巴和字节跳动开会，还得要去下载一个腾讯会议。怎么看都很蛋疼。
以我个人经验来看，美帝的公司，倒是真的没有明文禁止在工作PC上装竞争对手的软件。起码微软应该可以用google meet，谷歌应该也不至于反对用Teams。
当然推不推荐用一回事，禁止不禁止装，另外一回事。这是墙厚不厚的问题了。
为什么会造成这种局面，我想很多人都有观点。最基本的想法就是流量经济的时代，流量烂在自己锅里，也不能被别人蹭啊。这个，不仅仅国内互联网公司如此，国外互联网公司差别也不大。
所以，我们的移动互联网时代，比起PC互联网时代，是更开放了，还是更封闭了。我觉得是更封闭了。
不得不说，技术的发展，不一定是对全人类都有利的。有的时候，技术越发展，就让每个人能接触到的信息越狭隘。以我写公众号这么多年的经验来看，互联网上二极管越来越多，也和这种信息封闭不无关系。
这也是为什么很多人担心人工智能技术，尤其是通用的人工智能技术的发展，带给人类的不一定是好事情。因为，可能会让少数人少数公司控制了这种技术和技术带来的各方面的影响，而大部分人则会被局限在比现在还要狭窄偏激的信息空间，变得更糟糕。
国家已经强调互联网APP之间要互联互通很久了，我们也确实看到了一点点进展。但是考虑一下实际的墙，这种进展就多少显得很鸡肋了。
考虑到每家互联网公司对自己员工的工作电脑上什么不能装，什么可以装的限制，再想想APP之间的互联互通的实际现状，我们也应该为什么会发生阿里巴巴和字节跳动的员工开会，却不得不去下载腾讯会议的笑话了。。。
翻译：
Outrageous!! Alibaba and Bytedance meeting, forced to use Tencent meeting…
Some netizens said that ByteDance and Alibaba employees held a meeting together, because the computers of both parties could not install each other’s conference software, so they had to download Tencent conference to hold the meeting.
If there is anything wrong with the Internet, this thing is really wrong.
I checked to see for myself, and an Alibaba employee told me that ByteDance’s flying books were forbidden on company computers. And ByteDance employees told me that company computers are also prohibited from installing Alibaba Dingding.
So this thing is probably true, once Alibaba employees and Bytedance employees are going to have a meeting together, they don’t know what conference software to use. We can’t install each other’s software on our computers anyway.
I think it is not unusual for each giant in the Chinese Internet field to occupy their own ecosystem, and their ecosystem is not compatible with the other’s ecosystem. After all, if you send a wechat link on Tiktok, if you send a Alipay link on wechat, it is not a very easy thing.
But the competition is so fierce that if employees of several companies have to have a meeting with each other, there is no way to use a suitable meeting software. Because their home office computer, can only install their own home software.
So this thing, you call it reasonable, reasonable. After all, each of your software has rejected links from other companies to spread, why shouldn’t your employees be banned from installing other’s software?
But if you want to call it crazy, it’s crazy. Alibaba and Bytedance meeting, but also have to download a Tencent conference. It hurts in any way.
In my personal experience, there is really no explicit ban on using rival software on work PCS. At least Microsoft should be able to use google meet, and Google should not be opposed to using Teams.
Of course, it is not recommended to use one thing, and it is another thing to prohibit installation. It’s a question of wall thickness.
I think a lot of people have opinions about why this is happening. The most basic idea is the era of flow economy, flow rotten in their own pot, can not be rubbed by others. This is not only the case for domestic Internet companies, but also for foreign Internet companies.
Therefore, our mobile Internet era, compared with the PC Internet era, is more open or more closed. I think it’s more closed.
It has to be said that the development of technology is not necessarily beneficial to all mankind. Sometimes, the more technology develops, the narrower the information available to everyone. In my experience of writing public accounts for so many years, there are more and more diodes on the Internet, which is not unrelated to this kind of information closure.
This is also why many people worry that the development of artificial intelligence technology, especially general artificial intelligence technology, will not necessarily bring good things to humanity. Because a few people and a few companies may control this technology and all aspects of its impact, and the majority of people will be confined to a narrower and more extreme information space than they are now, and it will be worse.
The state has been stressing the need for connectivity between Internet apps for a long time, and we have indeed seen a little progress. But consider the actual wall, and this progress is somewhat feeble.
Considering each Internet company’s restrictions on what can’t be installed and what can be installed on their employees’ work computers, and considering the actual status quo of connectivity between apps, we should also think about why Alibaba and ByteDance employees have a meeting, but have to download the joke of Tencent’s meeting.
💬 评论 (0)