神州瑞景公司的一顿神操作让广大网友纷纷喊绝，不仅拒绝支付程序员解除劳动的经济补偿金、休息日加班费及8月的工资，还二上法庭以“严重失职”四字要求其赔偿高达90万的赔偿款。这是为何，我们一起去看看！
一、案件槽点满满
1.起诉提供的证据居然是——百度词条！
公司提交了“百度百科”词典名词解释和姚某的个人简历，称多线程技术整体性能明显优于单线程，做为一个拥有14年游戏开发经验，并在多家大型网络游戏公司工作过，工作背景和技术水平高，是游戏开发领域资深工程师，居然选择单线程来开发游戏，所有导致整体性能不佳。
2. 增加游戏大厅功能这种简单的功能，两天不就能搞定吗?
网友一对此打趣道：我有个简单的需求，做个支付宝吧。只是一个支付一下，没啥其他功能，两周就能做完吧。
网友二对此打趣说：诺基亚状告CTO，因其没能开发出iphone，导致公司失败，现要求CTO赔偿与苹果市值差价。
3. 月薪3万的技术总监试用期就6000元？!
公司的起诉书离谱就算了，更离谱的是一个月薪三万的技术总监试用期居然只有6k的工资，法律规定，试用期工资不得低于正式工资的80%，而其试用期的工资仅为正式工资的1/5。
4. 迷之操作：起诉员工，拒绝补偿和发放工资
起诉书里拒绝支付员工经济补偿金、休息日加班费及8月工资，也是活久见。有人就调侃道：找个开发把项目上线，然后再以延期为由把所有的工资和福利追回？这叫白嫖啊。
5. 企业亏损，念及员工是个人，赔90万就算了
法院二审判决表明，姚某无需承担任何赔偿。网友调侃道：公司是请人打工不是请人合伙，没道理企业亏损或利润未达预期就要劳动者赔偿。
二、事情原委
姚某于2018年6月25日入职神州瑞景公司（以下简称公司），担任游戏业务技术总监，试用期税前月薪为6000元，转正后税前月薪为3万元。
【一审判决】
公司主张姚某给公司造成了损失，拒绝支付2019年8月份工资28350.52元。一审判定认为，公司主张的损失系其转嫁企业成本和经营风险给员工，并无法律依据。
公司主张未发过文件要求姚某加班，拒绝支付休息日加班费4137.93元。一审判定认为，姚某虽主张其存在加班，但证据不足。
公司主张姚某严重延误工期、研发成果质量差、导致游戏玩家及客户大量流失、严重失职，造成重大损失，故解除劳动关系，拒绝支付解除补偿金45000元。一审判定认为，该公司缺乏依据，属违法解除劳动关系。
【二审判决】
公司因不服一审判决再次诉至法庭，主张因姚某“严重失职”导致公司损失379.1万元，要求姚某赔偿公司经济损失90万元。
1. 公司主张姚某负责研发的新游戏系统存在严重工期延误
公司称按原计划，新游戏系统应于2019年1月上旬上线，但直到2019年7月15日才正式上线，期间公司仅提出了增加游戏大厅的功能，但公司单方面认为该功能只是一个简单的功能，两天就能完成；
2. 公司主张姚某游戏项目出现严重故障期给公司造成重大损失
公司主张：
●游戏项目未能实现新、老系统如期平稳过渡，导致出现了长达42天的严重故障期，神州瑞景公司的游戏玩家跑了三分之二，每月损失26.6万元，计算一年的损失，为319.2万元。
●姚某负责研发的新游戏系统还存在多线层还是单线层结构选择错误问题，逻辑判断错误问题，系统崩溃隐患问题及其工作日志中记载的其他问题。
对此，姚某称：
●选择单线层和多线层只是正常的技术选型问题，单线层是业内的常规做法；
●工作日志和QQ聊天记录中提及的逻辑判断错误和其他问题均属于正常范围内的错误，在合理范围内。
最终法院驳回公司诉求，维持原判。
翻译：
Shenzhou Ruijing Company a divine operation let the majority of netizens have shouted, not only refused to pay programmers to cancel the labor of economic compensation, rest day overtime pay and August salary, but also two went to court to “serious dereliction of duty” four words to ask for compensation of up to 900,000. Why is that? Let’s go and see!
First, the case slot is full
- The evidence provided by the prosecution is actually — Baidu entry!
The company submitted the “Baidu encyclopedia” dictionary noun explanation and Yao’s resume, said that the overall performance of multithreading technology is significantly better than single thread, as a 14 years of experience in game development, and in a number of large online game companies worked, work background and technical level is high, is a senior engineer in the field of game development, actually choose single thread to develop games, This results in poor overall performance.
- Add a simple function such as the game hall function, can not be done in two days?
Netizen one quipped: I have a simple demand, make a Alipay. It’s just a payment, nothing else, and it’ll be done in two weeks.
Net user 2 quipped: Nokia sued CTO, because it failed to develop the iphone, the company is now demanding CTO compensation and Apple market value difference.
- 6000 Yuan for a technical director with a monthly salary of 30,000 Yuan? !
What’s more outrageous is that a technical director with a monthly salary of 30,000 yuan earns only 6k during the probation period. According to the law, the probation period salary should not be less than 80% of the formal salary, and the probation period salary is only 1/5 of the formal salary.
- Operation of mystery: Sue employees, refuse compensation and pay wages
The complaint denies financial compensation, overtime pay for days off and August wages. One quips: Find a developer to bring the project online and then claw back all the wages and benefits because of the delay? It’s called whoring.
- The loss of the enterprise, thinking that the employee is an individual, pay 900,000 even
The court of second instance judgment shows that Yao Mou does not have to bear any compensation. Netizens joked: the company is to hire people to work rather than partnership, there is no reason for the loss of enterprises or profits did not meet expectations to workers compensation.
Two, what happened
Mr. Yao joined Shenzhou Ruijing Company (hereinafter referred to as the company) on June 25, 2018 as the technical director of game business. His monthly salary before tax is 6,000 yuan during the probation period and 30,000 yuan after he becomes a regular employee.
[Judgment of the first instance]
The company claimed that Yao caused losses to the company and refused to pay 28,350.52 yuan in August 2019. The judgment of the first instance held that the loss claimed by the company was the transfer of enterprise costs and operational risks to the employees, and there was no legal basis.
The company claimed that it had not issued a document requiring Yao to work overtime and refused to pay 4137.93 yuan for overtime on rest days. The first trial decided that Yao had argued that there was overtime work, but the evidence was insufficient.
The company claimed that Yao seriously delayed the construction period, poor quality of research and development results, resulting in a large number of game players and customers, serious dereliction of duty, resulting in heavy losses, so the labor relationship was terminated, refused to pay the release compensation of 45,000 yuan. The first instance decided that the company lacked the basis and illegally terminated labor relations.
[Judgment of the second instance]
The company appealed to the court again for refusing to accept the judgment of the first instance, claiming that the company lost 3.791 million yuan due to Yao’s “serious dereliction of duty”, and asked Yao to compensate the company for the economic loss of 900,000 yuan.
- The company claims that the new game system developed by Mr. Yao is seriously delayed
According to the company, the new game system was originally scheduled to go live in early January 2019, but it was not officially launched until July 15, 2019. During this period, the company only proposed to add the function of the game hall, but the company unilaterally believed that the function was a simple function that could be completed in two days.
- The company claims that the serious failure period of Yao’s game project has caused heavy losses to the company
The company maintains that:
● The game project failed to realize the smooth transition between the new and the old system as scheduled, resulting in a serious failure period of 42 days. The game players of Shenzhou Ruijing Company ran two-thirds of the time, resulting in a loss of 266,000 yuan per month. The calculated loss of a year is 3,192,000 yuan.
● The new game system that Mr. Yao is responsible for research and development still has the problem of choosing the wrong structure of multi-layer or single-layer, the problem of logical judgment, the problem of hidden trouble of system crash and other problems recorded in the work log.
In this regard, Yao said:
● The selection of single line layer and multi-line layer is a normal technical selection problem, single line layer is the conventional practice in the industry;
● The logical judgment error and other problems mentioned in the work log and QQ chat records are within the normal range of errors, within the reasonable range.
The court rejected the company’s claim and upheld the original verdict.
本文由数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）翻译而成，作者/编辑/翻译：数字化转型网默然。
免责声明: 本网站(http://www.szhzxw.cn/)内容主要来自原创、合作媒体供稿和第三方投稿，凡在本网站出现的信息，均仅供参考。本网站将尽力确保所提供信息的准确性及可靠性，但不保证有关资料的准确性及可靠性，读者在使用前请进一步核实，并对任何自主决定的行为负责。本网站对有关资料所引致的错误、不确或遗漏，概不负任何法律责任。
本网站刊载的所有内容(包括但不仅限文字、图片、LOGO、音频、视频、软件、程序等) 版权归原作者所有。任何单位或个人认为本网站中的内容可能涉嫌侵犯其知识产权或存在不实内容时，请及时通知本站，予以删除。
