1）大多数个人和公司混淆了数据管理和技术管理，阻碍了两者的正确管理。

数据管理：简单来说就是利用各种信息技术对数据进行有效的收集、存储、处理和应用的过程。其目的在于充分有效地发挥数据的作用。强调：数据管理和利用。

技术管理：技术管理通常是指在技术行业当中所作的管理工作，管理者一般具有较高的技术水平，同时带领着自己所管理的团队完成某项技术任务。要求管理者对所领导的团队的技术分配，技术指向和技术监察。强调：利用技术知识和能力来提高整个团队的效率。

这和信息化与数字化的关系比较类似，数据管理相当于信息的收集和整合利用，而技术管理需要利用以数据为代表的信息，目的就是提升内部流程运转和提高效率。

2）信息孤岛阻碍了数据质量并干扰了各级数据共享。

IT和业务团队之间存在相当大的紧张关系。由于缺乏共同语言，技术和业务团队无法相互交谈。

更通俗地理解，技术人员思考的是如何构建系统从而达成某一效果或具备某种功能；而业务人员思考的是如何满足业务需求，怎么让效果达到的更好。

问题就在于：技术人员专业性很高，直白点，太专业的东西说出来业务人员听不懂；业务人员可能知道缺陷在哪个地方或者改进的方向可以是怎样的，但是表达不出来，即使表达出来，技术人员对业务缺乏理解，改进的效果也不那么乐观。

长此以往，IT和业务团队之间的关系越发紧张。

3）标准化产品呈现市场流失的明显态势。

目前中国的大环境就是：推销标准化产品已经无效，客户要求按照自己的业务发展需求立项，采购，客制化。

标准化产品的优点很明显：专业、针对性比较强。

但缺点和优点一样突出：针对性比较强，但是没有那么强，无法满足每一个企业的每一个需求。同时，不同的标准化产品之间会有信息壁垒，导致后期维护成本很高，升级慢、落地慢，缺点十分明显。

因此越来越多的企业要求按照自己的业务发展需求进行系统构建。

翻译:

What is the current situation of digital development of domestic enterprises?

1) Most individuals and companies confuse data management and technology management, preventing the correct management of both.

Data management: Simply put, it is the process of using various information technologies to effectively collect, store, process and apply data. The aim is to make full and effective use of data. Emphasis: Data management and utilization.

Technical management: Technical management usually refers to the management work done in the technology industry. Managers generally have a high technical level and lead their management team to complete a certain technical task. Managers are required to assign, direct and monitor the technology of the team they lead. Emphasis: Use technical knowledge and capabilities to improve the efficiency of the entire team.

This is similar to the relationship between informatization and digitalization. Data management is equivalent to the collection, integration and utilization of information, while technology management requires the use of information represented by data to improve the operation of internal processes and improve efficiency.

2) Information silos hinder data quality and interfere with data sharing at all levels.

There is considerable tension between IT and business teams. The lack of a common language prevented the technical and business teams from talking to each other.

More generally, technologists think about how to build systems to achieve an effect or function; And the business people think about how to meet the business needs, how to make the effect better.

The problem is: technical personnel are very professional, frankly, too professional things to say business personnel can not understand; The business person may know where the defect is or what the direction of improvement can be, but cannot express it, and even if it is expressed, the technical person lacks understanding of the business and the effect of the improvement is not so optimistic.

Over time, the relationship between IT and business teams has become increasingly strained.

3) Standardized products show an obvious trend of market loss.

The current environment in China is that the promotion of standardized products is no longer effective, and customers require projects, procurement, and customization according to their own business development needs.

The advantages of standardized products are obvious: professional and targeted.

But the disadvantages are as prominent as the advantages: more targeted, but not so strong, can not meet every need of every business. At the same time, there will be information barriers between different standardized products, resulting in high maintenance costs, slow upgrades, slow landing, and obvious shortcomings.

Therefore, more and more enterprises require system construction according to their own business development needs.