哥伦比亚一名法官在牵涉一名被诊断患有自闭症谱系障碍（ASD）的儿童的医疗权利案件中使用了AI软件ChatGPT。
据哥伦比亚广播电台Blu Radio报道，法官Juan Manuel Padill负责审理发生在卡塔赫纳的这起案件，使用OpenAI工具来确定这名男孩是否可以免交医疗费用，包括交通费用。
Padilla向ChatGPT工具询问了一系列问题，以核实案件中的相关信息。
他表示，按照哥伦比亚2022年第2213号法律，法官有时可以使用AI软件来协助做出裁决。
这家广播电台公布了Padilla与ChatGPT之间的问答记录，法官问道：“自闭症患者可以在治疗中无需支付医疗费用吗？”
ChatGPT如此回答：“是的，可以免交费用。按照哥伦比亚法规，被诊断患有自闭症的未成年人可以在治疗中无需支付医疗费用。”
ChatGPT澄清2015年的第1753号法律规定了这项权益，“适用于为接受社会保障医疗系统援助的那些人提供公共或私人医疗服务的所有机构”。
Padilla告诉Blu Radio使用ChatGPT帮助节省了时间，并在接受英国《卫报》采访时表示，这有助于“为起草文本提供便利”。不过他补充道，使用ChatGPT并不是“为了取代”法官。他认为，ChatGPT工具可以“缩短”司法系统的“响应时间”，并且以“一种有组织、简单化、条理化的方式”提供信息。
ChatGPT的确支持Padilla的这一裁决：这名孩子的医疗费用由其医疗方案支付，因为他的父母负担不起这笔费用。
虽然这一裁决没有遭到反对，但法官在此案中使用ChatGPT的做法还是招到了其他人的批评，他们认为AI在法庭上根本就没有一席之地。
ChatGPT于去年11月向公众发布，在问世短短两个月内就俘获1亿用户的芳心，成为了有史以来发展势头最猛的应用程序。
波哥大罗萨里奥大学的Juan David Gutierrez教授周二在推文上表示，这种AI工具可能“返回不正确、不准确、虚假的结果”，导致做出的决定可能与法官和秘书亲自查看信息后做出的决定截然相反。
尽管受到外界的抨击，但哥伦比亚最高法院的Octavio Tejeiro法官还是对Padilla决定使用ChatGPT的做法表示了赞赏。他告诉《卫报》，司法系统“应该充分利用技术作为一种工具”。他补充道：“必须将AI视为一种帮助法官提高判断力的工具。”
翻译：
A judge in Colombia used the AI software ChatGPT in a medical rights case involving a child diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
Judge Juan Manuel Padill, who is overseeing the case in Cartagena, used the OpenAI tool to determine whether the boy would be exempt from medical expenses. Including transportation, according to Colombian Radio station Blu Radio.
Padilla asked the ChatGPT tool a series of questions to verify relevant information in the case.
He said that under Colombia’s Law 2213 of 2022, judges can sometimes use AI software to help make decisions.
The radio station published a transcript of the question and answer between Padilla and ChatGPT, in which the judge asked: “Can autistic people be treated without paying medical fees?”
ChatGPT replied, “Yes, no fee. Under Colombian regulations, minors diagnosed with autism can be treated without paying medical fees.”
ChatGPT clarified that Law 1753 of 2015, which provides this benefit, “applies to all institutions providing public or private medical services to those receiving assistance from the Social Security medical system”.
Padilla told Blu Radio that using ChatGPT helped save time. And told Britain’s Guardian newspaper that it helped “facilitate the drafting of the text.” But he added that ChatGPT was not used “to replace” judges. ChatGPT, he argues, can “shorten the response time” of the justice system and provide information “in an organized, simple and structured way”.
ChatGPT did support Padilla’s ruling that the child’s medical expenses would be covered by his medical plan because his parents could not afford it.
While the ruling was not opposed. The judge’s use of ChatGPT in the case drew criticism from others who argued that AI had no place in the courtroom.
ChatGPT was released to the public in November. And in just two months Chatgpt has captured the hearts of 100 million users, making it the fastest growing app of all time.
Professor Juan David Gutierrez of the University of Rosario in Bogota tweeted on Tuesday that the AI tool could “return incorrect, inaccurate, false results”, leading to decisions that could be the opposite of those made by judges and secretaries looking at the information themselves.
Despite the criticism, Justice Octavio Tejeiro of Colombia’s Supreme Court praised Padilla’s decision to use ChatGPT. He told the Guardian that the justice system “should make full use of technology as a tool”. “AI must be seen as a tool to help judges improve their judgment,” he added.
本文由数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）转载而成，来源于网络；编辑/翻译：数字化转型网宁檬树。
免责声明: 本网站(http://www.szhzxw.cn/)内容主要来自原创、合作媒体供稿和第三方投稿，凡在本网站出现的信息，均仅供参考。本网站将尽力确保所提供信息的准确性及可靠性，但不保证有关资料的准确性及可靠性，读者在使用前请进一步核实，并对任何自主决定的行为负责。本网站对有关资料所引致的错误、不确或遗漏，概不负任何法律责任。
本网站刊载的所有内容(包括但不仅限文字、图片、LOGO、音频、视频、软件、程序等) 版权归原作者所有。任何单位或个人认为本网站中的内容可能涉嫌侵犯其知识产权或存在不实内容时，请及时通知本站，予以删除。
