科技圈继ChatGPT之父Sam Altman（山姆·奥特曼）突遭罢免事件中的“宫斗剧情”的大瓜后，又一个硅谷“惊天大瓜”被爆出。
3月1日，特斯拉CEO马斯克向美国旧金山高等法院提交了一份长达46页的诉讼书，痛斥OpenAI以及其联合创始人Sam Altman和Greg Brockman，及OpenAI的管理层在2023年违背了原来公司成立时所承诺的非盈利的使命，与微软建立了独家合作的关系，违反了信托义务、合同协议且存在不公平的商业行为，在ChatGPT、Sora等产品爆火后，并未将先进的AI技术的代码进行开源，反而转向闭源并开始进行盈利。
那么为什么马斯克会如此气愤？这就要追溯到OpenAI的创立了。
2015年12月，OpenAI由Elon Reeve Musk（特斯拉CEO）、Sam Altman、Greg Brockman、Reid Hoffman等人发起创立，而当时马斯克、Sam Altman等人是联合创办的非营利组织，且Elon Reeve Musk与Sam Altman同为最初的董事会成员。 数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）
▲附件中提供的OpenAI创始协议（图源：诉讼文件）
2016年-2020年9月期间，根据诉讼内容显示，马斯克在此期间内向OpenAI捐赠了超过4400万美元，且除了资金支持外，马斯克在OpenAI的研究方向上也提供了相应的建议，以及付出了招募顶尖科学家和工程师的努力。 数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）
2018年，以理由为Elon Reeve Musk担任特斯拉的首席信息官在“未来可能存在利益冲突”，马斯克辞去了董事会的席位。而Sam Altman则是声称是因为Elon Reeve Musk认为OpenAI已经落后于Google（谷歌）等其他公司，想要自己接管OpenAI，但是被董事会拒绝了才辞去了董事会席位的。
2019年7月起至2020年，得益于微软的资金以及技术支持，OpenAI发布的ChatGPT的几个版本，也纷纷引起了业界的广泛关注。
2023年7月，Elon Reeve Musk在社交平台对外宣布，正式成立了xAI这家人工智能公司，且xAI的核心团队成员曾经分别在DeepMind、OpenAI、谷歌研究、微软研究、特斯拉等知名企业工作过。
如果是关注马斯克的朋友也会注意到，多年来，马斯克经常在社交平台上表达对OpenAI转型商业盈利和闭源模式的不满，且对OpenAI和微软的合作冷嘲热讽。
那在这份长达46页，共有1.4万字的诉讼文件中，马斯克的诉求又会是什么呢？
可以总结为以下几点：
1、希望OpenAI回归成立初心，把AI技术开源；
2、希望OpenAI把违反合同期间挣的钱都要还回来，且要对其使用捐赠款项的情况进行清查；
当然，马斯克也把各种利息和律师费都算的清清楚楚，也可以说是对OpenAI及Sam Altman来了一次彻彻底底的“清算”。以下是马斯克诉讼中最终希望法院对OpenAI的判决，列出的10个大项11个小项部分的原文编译：原告请求对被告的判决如下：
（一）要求法院下令强制执行被告违背的合同承诺，包括但不限于：
1、要求被告继续遵循OpenAI的长期实践，将在OpenAI开发的AI研究和技术向公众开放。
2、禁止被告利用OpenAI或其资产为个别被告、微软或任何其他特定个人或实体的财务利益服务。
（二）要求司法部门确定GPT-4已经事实上成为AGI，因此其超出了OpenAI对微软的许可范围。
（三）要求司法确定Q*和其他正在开发中的OpenAI下一代大语言模型是AGI，并因此超出了OpenAI对微软的许可范围。 数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）
（四）与上述（一）至（三）项一致并实施的禁令救济；
（五）根据商业和职业法规第17200条等规定，要求对被告在从事本文所述的不公平和不当行为期间收到的所有款项进行返还或没收，此外还包括判决前的利息和罚款。
（六）对原告和其他人向OpenAI捐赠的资金、由此资助的知识产权或衍生作品，以及被告为个人利益或任何个人、第三方实体的利益使用捐赠资金的情况进行核算。
（七）要求在审判中证明的一般赔偿和惩罚性损害赔偿，原告会将每一项损害赔偿捐赠给非营利组织或慈善机构。
（八）根据加利福尼亚民事诉讼法典第1021.5条规定的律师费。
（九）要求最高法定利率的判决前和判决后利息。
（十）要求法院认为公正和适当的其他和进一步的救济。
随着ChatGPT的一战成名，再到最近火爆全球的Sora，OpenAI一直都处于全球科技行业的风口浪尖，OpenAI的一举一动都牵动着各界人士的目光。
而前段时间“AI换脸”诈骗案，原文链接：男子参加多人会议，只有自己是真人！
也不得不让人在人工智能（AI）相关新技术不断发展创新的同时，也产生了对于人工智能（AI）的安全和伦理方面所带来的问题的关注，那么如何去平衡AI安全与技术快速发展二者的关系，也成为了人们关注和讨论的热点。 数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）
那么从这份诉讼文件我们也可以看到，马斯克起诉OpenAI的缘由也是出于对AI安全的担忧，但背后是否还存在着对其发展眼红的原因，我们也无法妄自揣测。
马斯克状告OpenAI的这场诉讼将定于2024年7月31日召开案件管理会议。
那么马斯克与OpenAI之间的这场纠葛大戏，将会往哪个方向发展呢？这次公开诉讼是否会揭开此前Sam Altman的夺权大戏以及神秘的Q项目背后的真正答案呢？我们将持续关注……
翻译：
Burst! Musk is going to court against OpenAI and its co-founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman? !
In the technology circle, after the “palace drama” in the sudden ouster of Sam Altman, the father of ChatGPT, another Silicon Valley “surprise big melon” was exploded.
On March 1, Tesla CEO Musk filed a 46-page lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court, accusing OpenAI, its co-founders Sam Altman and Greg Brockman, and OpenAI’s management of violating the non-profit mission promised by the original company when it was founded in 2023. Established an exclusive partnership with Microsoft, violated fiduciary duties, contractual agreements and unfair business practices, and turned to closed source and started making profits instead of open source code for advanced AI technology after ChatGPT, Sora and other products became popular.
So why is Musk so angry? This goes back to the creation of OpenAI.
In December 2015, OpenAI was founded by Elon Reeve Musk (CEO of Tesla), Sam Altman, Greg Brockman, Reid Hoffman and others, and at that time Musk, Sam Altman and others were co-founding non-profit organizations. Elon Reeve Musk and Sam Altman were original board members.
▲ The OpenAI Founding Agreement provided in the attachment (Source: litigation documents)
Between 2016 and September 2020, according to the lawsuit, Musk donated more than $44 million to OpenAI during this period, and in addition to financial support, Musk also provided corresponding advice on OpenAI’s research direction, as well as efforts to recruit top scientists and engineers.
In 2018, Elon Reeve Musk resigned his seat on Tesla’s board of directors, citing “potential conflicts of interest in the future” as Tesla’s chief information officer. Altman claimed that Elon Reeve Musk wanted to take over OpenAI himself because he believed that OpenAI had fallen behind other companies such as Google (Google), but the board refused to resign. 数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）
From July 2019 to 2020, thanks to Microsoft’s funding and technical support, several versions of ChatGPT released by OpenAI have also attracted widespread attention in the industry.
In July 2023, Elon Reeve Musk announced on the social platform that xAI, an artificial intelligence company, was officially established, and xAI’s core team members had worked in DeepMind, OpenAI, Google Research, Microsoft Research, Tesla and other well-known enterprises.
If you are concerned about Musk’s friends will also notice that over the years, Musk often expressed his dissatisfaction with OpenAI’s transformation of commercial profit and closed source model on the social platform, and made sarcastic remarks about OpenAI’s cooperation with Microsoft.
What will Musk be asking for in the 46-page, 14,000-word lawsuit?
It can be summarized as follows:
1. I hope OpenAI will return to its original intention and open source AI technology;
2. Expect OpenAI to return all the money earned during the breach of contract, and to check its use of donated funds;
Of course, Musk also calculated all kinds of interest and legal fees clearly, which can be said to be a thorough “liquidation” of OpenAI and Sam Altman. The following is the original text of the 10 major and 11 minor items listed in Musk’s lawsuit that he ultimately wants the court to decide against OpenAI: The plaintiff seeks the following judgment against the defendant:
(1) to seek a court order to enforce contractual commitments breached by the defendant, including but not limited to: 数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）
1) Require Defendants to continue to follow OpenAI’s longstanding practice of making AI research and technology developed at OpenAI available to the public.
2) Defendants are prohibited from using OpenAI or its assets to serve the financial interests of individual Defendants, Microsoft, or any other specific person or entity.
(2) Require the Justice Department to determine that GPT-4 has de facto become AGI and is therefore outside the scope of OpenAI’s license to Microsoft.
(3) to ask the judiciary to determine that Q* and other OpenAI next generation large language models under development are AGI and therefore beyond the scope of OpenAI’s license to Microsoft.
(4) injunctive relief consistent with items (1) to (3) above and implemented;
(5) require the return or forfeiture of all monies received by the defendant during the period in which he engaged in the unfair and improper conduct described herein, in addition to pre-judgment interest and fines, in accordance with, inter alia, Section 17200 of the Business and Professions Code.
(6) An accounting of funds donated by Plaintiff and others to OpenAI, intellectual property rights or derivative works funded therefrom, and the use of donated funds by Defendant for personal benefit or for the benefit of any individual or third party entity.
(7) Seek general and punitive damages proven at trial, each of which the plaintiff will donate to a non-profit organization or charity.
(8) Attorney’s fees under Section 1021.5 of the California Code of Civil Procedure.
(9) Pre-judgment and post-judgment interest for the maximum legal interest rate.
(10) to request such other and further relief as the court deems just and appropriate. With the fame of ChatGPT, and then to the recent global hot Sora, OpenAI has been at the forefront of the global technology industry, and every move of OpenAI has affected the eyes of people from all walks of life.
Some time ago, the “AI face change” fraud case, the original link: Men participate in multiple meetings, only they are real people! 数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）
At the same time as the continuous development and innovation of new technologies related to artificial intelligence (AI), attention has also been paid to the problems brought about by the safety and ethics of artificial intelligence (AI), so how to balance the relationship between AI security and the rapid development of technology has also become a hot topic of attention and discussion.
So from this lawsuit document we can also see that Musk sued OpenAI for the reason is also out of concern for AI safety, but behind whether there is still a reason for its development, we can not speculate.
Musk’s lawsuit against OpenAI is scheduled for a case management conference on July 31, 2024.
So where does this entanglement between Musk and OpenAI go from here? Will this public lawsuit reveal the real answers behind Sam Altman’s power grab and mysterious Project Q? We will keep an eye on…
本文由数字化转型网（www.szhzxw.cn）根据公开资料整理撰写而成，作者：数字化转型网小编；编辑/翻译：数字化转型网宁檬树。
免责声明: 本网站(https://www.szhzxw.cn/)内容主要来自原创、合作媒体供稿和第三方投稿，凡在本网站出现的信息，均仅供参考。本网站将尽力确保所提供信息的准确性及可靠性，但不保证有关资料的准确性及可靠性，读者在使用前请进一步核实，并对任何自主决定的行为负责。本网站对有关资料所引致的错误、不确或遗漏，概不负任何法律责任。
本网站刊载的所有内容(包括但不仅限文字、图片、LOGO、音频、视频、软件、程序等) 版权归原作者所有。任何单位或个人认为本网站中的内容可能涉嫌侵犯其知识产权或存在不实内容时，请及时通知本站，予以删除。
